What would your site score? Find out
Acme Co
Mostly healthy. 3 warnings to review.
acme-co.example B · Good 30 checks across 3 pages
We ran 30 checks across 3 pages. 3 issues are open across 3 areas, spread evenly, while 3 categories came back clean. Start with SEO below, then work down the action plan.
Action Plan
3 fixes · ranked by points added to your score
Quick wins
Meta description is missing. Search engines will generate their own snippet, which may not represent the page well.
Meta description is missing. Search engines will generate their own snippet, which may not represent the page well.
Open Graph meta tags are missing. Links shared on social media will show a generic preview instead of your content.
Open Graph meta tags are missing. Links shared on social media will show a generic preview instead of your content.
View 1 deeper fix Show less
Deeper fixes
3 images use JPEG/PNG instead of modern formats. WebP or AVIF would reduce file size by 25-50%.
3 images use JPEG/PNG instead of modern formats. WebP or AVIF would reduce file size by 25-50%.
Full results, by category
Every check we ran, grouped by category. The fixes above are the priority; expand a category to see the complete detail.
SEO 1 of 6 to fix
URL structure is checked on the homepage only.
Meta description is missing. Search engines will generate their own snippet, which may not represent the page well.
Meta description is missing. Search engines will generate their own snippet, which may not represent the page well.
5 other checks passed
-
Page Title
Page title is present and within the recommended length.
-
Canonical URL
Canonical URL is set correctly.
-
Robots.txt
Robots.txt file is present.
-
XML Sitemap
XML sitemap found at /sitemap.xml with 24 URLs.
-
Structured Data (Schema.org)
Schema.org structured data found (Organization, BreadcrumbList).
Speed 1 of 5 to fix
3 images use JPEG/PNG instead of modern formats. WebP or AVIF would reduce file size by 25-50%.
3 images use JPEG/PNG instead of modern formats. WebP or AVIF would reduce file size by 25-50%.
4 other checks passed
-
Page Size
HTML document size is 42KB, within the recommended limit.
-
Static Asset Caching
Static assets have appropriate cache headers.
-
Response Compression
Response compression (gzip) is enabled.
-
Font Loading Strategy
Web fonts load with font-display: swap.
Technical Health 1 of 6 to fix
Broken images and custom 404 page are checked on the homepage only.
Open Graph meta tags are missing. Links shared on social media will show a generic preview instead of your content.
Open Graph meta tags are missing. Links shared on social media will show a generic preview instead of your content.
5 other checks passed
-
Favicon
Favicon is present.
-
DOCTYPE Declaration
DOCTYPE declaration is present.
-
Character Encoding
Character encoding is declared.
-
Broken Links
No broken internal links detected.
-
Twitter Card Tags
Twitter Card meta tags are present.
Uptime All 3 checks passed
-
Page Reachability
All pages returned HTTP 200.
-
Server Response Time
Server responded in 320ms, within the recommended 600ms threshold.
-
Redirect Chain Length
No excessive redirect chains detected.
Security All 5 checks passed
Cookie security is checked on the homepage only.
-
HTTPS Enforcement
Site is served over HTTPS.
-
SSL Certificate
SSL certificate is valid and not expiring soon.
-
Mixed Content (HTTP on HTTPS)
No mixed content detected.
-
Strict Transport Security (HSTS)
Strict-Transport-Security header is present.
-
Content Security Policy
Content-Security-Policy header is configured.
Accessibility All 5 checks passed
Checks 15 common markup issues. Not a full WCAG 2.2 audit.
-
Main Heading (H1)
Page has exactly one H1 tag.
-
Page Language
HTML lang attribute is set.
-
Mobile Viewport
Mobile viewport is configured correctly.
-
Image Alt Text
All images have descriptive alt text.
-
Heading Order
Heading hierarchy is well-structured.
AI Readiness
BETA
B
Needs Work
4 of 6 signals
AI Readiness
BETA B Needs Work 4 of 6 signalsHow well your homepage covers the structure, content, and trust signals AI tools look for.
Beta, scored from your homepage only. It does not affect your page health score above.
Needs Work 50/100
First scan. We'll track changes.
What's working
- Crawlers / Allowed
- Headings / Structure
- Content / Readable
Why this rating
- No JSON-LD structured data found.
- No llms.txt file found.
Top fixes
- Add Organization and WebSite JSON-LD to the homepage.
- Publish an llms.txt file at your domain root.
What we checked
Other
- Structured Data / Jsonld
- Llms Txt / Present
- Crawlers / Allowed
- Headings / Structure
- Content / Readable
- Meta / Title
How the score works
Your score weights failures by severity, so the checks that matter most move it most. A failing critical counts about five times as much as a passing check, and a failing warning about twice as much.
Fixes are sorted by how much they help. The ones at the top of the action plan give you the most gain for the least work. A single fix can raise your score by several points if it applies to many pages at once.
Scans check multiple pages, not just the home page. This means the report can catch issues that hide on pages you rarely visit.
You can share any report with a link. Send it to your team, your boss, or your client. The link works for anyone, no login needed. Use it to show what changed and what still needs work.
Each scan saves a snapshot so you can look back and see how your site has changed over time. When a check that used to pass starts to fail, the report flags it as a new issue. When you fix something, the next scan marks it as resolved. This makes it easy to track your progress week by week and spot problems before your users do.
Every finding names the check that ran and the page it ran on, so you can go and look for yourself. Checks run against saved real pages whenever we change them, which catches a check that starts reporting something new. When a check turns out to be wrong, we fix it and write it up on our changelog.
SiteCurl audit report
Scope and method
- Scanned
- Site
- acme-co.example
- Coverage
- 30 checks across 3 pages
- Method
- Automated scan
Categories assessed Uptime, Security, SEO, Speed, Accessibility, and Technical Health
Results describe what these automated checks could observe at the time of the scan. They are guidance for improving the site.
What each category covers
SEO checks how well search engines can find and rank your pages. This covers title tags, meta data, links, and how easy your text is to read. Good SEO helps more people find your site for free.
Speed looks at how fast your pages load. It checks image sizes, script counts, file sizes, and how well your server sends data. Fast pages keep users on your site and help your search rank.
Security tests for safe web headers and safe link use. It checks HTTPS, SSL, cookie rules, and more. Strong security keeps user data safe and builds trust.
Accessibility checks if all users can use your site. This covers alt text on images, heading order, and page markup. A site that works for all users reaches more people.
Technical health reviews your site setup and link health. It flags broken links, missing pages, and social share tags. A clean setup means fewer bugs and a better experience for your users.
Uptime checks if your site loads and how fast the server replies. It also looks for redirect chains that slow things down. If your site is down, no one can use it.
AI readiness looks at the SEO and content fundamentals AI tools rely on to read your site. It checks your markup, your data, and your content depth. Google's guidance is that no special AI optimization is needed beyond good SEO.
Your site has issues like these.
Find them before your clients do.
Start 7-Day Studio TrialFull Studio access. No credit card required.
Your first scan runs in under a minute. You get a full report just like this one, with a score, a list of fixes, and clear next steps.